If you can love Twilight and make art and comments about it, why can't we do the opposite?

You want five reasons? Okay.
-Stephenie Meyer is a bad writer.
-All the characters are flat and void of personality (except Jacob, Alice, Emmet, and Seth).
-Bella is a Mary-Sue who puts all other Mary-sues to shame.
-It is teaching young girls that there is a perfect sparkling man out there for all of them.
-It teaches young girls that it's okay if your boyfriend abuses you, as long as he says you smell nice.
-What Edward and Bella have isn't love. You're most likely going to argue, but until you are in a real, loving relationship, you will never understand that.
-Every other page is Bella going into an in-depth description of what Edward looks like.
-Meyer raped the thesaurus for words like "dazzling" and "chagrin" then proceeded to over-use them.
-The story had no plot. I don't care how holy you think the damn series is; it has NO plot.
-The hype is pointless. Even if Meyer was a talented writer, the hype is still way too much.
-The fangirls are really insane. They're also idiots.
-Harry Potter is better by far.
-This may be news to you, but the whole world does NOT love Twilight. 42 million copies (of any book in the series; not just Twilight) were sold worldwide. Does that seem like a lot? Well, there are about 306 million people just in America So, even if all the people who bought them were American, that would still be only 15-20% of the country.

Wow! That's thirteen reasons! The book must REALLY suck!

Oh, yeah...do you even know what 'faggot' means?

--
Twilight Reading it and hitting yourself in the face with it have about the same effect

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

1) book was poorly written, she spent to much time putting emphasis on things that did not need it, we don't need to know exactly what Bella is wearing to the air port. we only need to hear once that Edward is beautiful/angelic/a mortal adonas.. not every 3 words.

2) Edward is text book stalker/abuser/creep the book promotes things that if they were done in today's society they would be in jail. and no don't tell me that it was just because he was trying to protect her.. he was breaking and entering into Bella's house before they were even friend and James wasn't even mentioned yet. Edward rips the engine out of her truck to keep her from seeing her friends. he begins to isolate her in her house because she is afraid everyone in the world is out to get her and she even goes so far as to want to still her own pulse so that she doesn't anger Edward and bring out his instincts.

3) book promotes pedophilia. yes Nessy may look 18 and have the maturity when she is able to mate with Jacob but she is still only 8 or 9 or what ever years old. that is still statutory rape just because she looks and is as mature as an adult still doesn't mean she is an adult. and the whole point of imprinting is to pass on the werewolf gene so you know it is going to end up sexual

4) the movie was horrible, the cinematography was high end back in the 1960's. we can make movies that are 100% CGI that you can't tell it's CGI but they couldn't even make Edwards running through the forest look natural? the actress that played Bella had no emotion in her face.. at any point in the movie her shocked face looked like her happy face. her voice held the same amount of emotion as her face did. the guy that played Edward did better as Cedric in Harry Potter then he did in that movie. for being someone that in the book is constantly described as angelic and a living statue... he was fugly in the movie. his face was sunken in he wasn't pail..he looked sick.. the other vampires were the ugliest i had ever seen and the one blond boy looked like he had a rod shoved up his ass the whole movie. the only decent actor was the father and Mr. Cullen (don't remember his name don't care to)

5) the rabid fans are what make the books that much worse. you insist that if we are not on the ground sucking Edwards sparkly dick we need to be attacked and looked down upon. yes i saw your group and i saw how you had gone down to petty personal insults against anti's that didn't like the movie and book and it's people like you who make the series that much more easy to hate. we are allowed to dislike the book and are allowed to our own opinion on why we don't like the book and you will find most anti's share my same view.. and alot of sane fans also dislike parts of the book.

6) Meyers states that her vampires are based on science... no they are not.. she butchered science and made her own that none of which makes any ounce of sense. vampires with diamond hard skin would be incapable of moving as their skin would have no elasticity in order for their joints to move giving them the ability to have he extreme speed/strength that they do. vampires are hunters in order to kill they would need to either A) stalk their pray like all hunters or b) seduce them like in the old movies.. having sparkling skin would not benefit them in either situation as sparkling skin would alert all pray to their presence and the seduction if people didn't burst out laughing first they would know something was wrong and that natural instinct that something was wrong would be screaming in their head. Meyers did not give them fangs but vampires in order to feed need to find the biggest vein in their prays body which is the jugular and that is very deep in the body of any animal and with normal human teeth would be impossible to puncture so it would be very easy for their pray to escape as their hold would be minimal. also it would be impossible for a vampire to have sex or reproduce [link] because i already wrote it out once don't want to do it again.


opps.. you said 5 i gave you 6 reasons i hate twilight.. and never once did i say because vampires were gay or cause it's stupid.

--
Zero tolerance with art thieves

check out my gallery [link]

The faact that it was so poorly written.

--
Twilight Reading it and hitting yourself in the face with it have about the same effect

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!